注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

牧星谭邮--肖宏的博客

昨日海空牧星箭,今朝史河探邮趣;近代华夏史,百年邮传承。

 
 
 

日志

 
 
关于我

国家级邮展评审员 延陵邮学会副会长 常州市集邮协会副会长 江苏省集邮协会理事、学术委员会委员

网易考拉推荐

大清郵政史(1897-1911)之混合封--- 日本客郵局(二)  

2017-08-18 07:30:58|  分类: 邮史资料 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |
日本客郵局 (二)
Question No.7
What was the postage rate applied for this cover?
大清郵政史(1897-1911)之混合封--- 日本客郵局(二) - 延陵牧星 - 牧星谭邮--肖宏的博客
 From Shanghai to Japan. CIP 5c canceled by Shanghai Dollar Dater on Oct. 29, 1898. Japanese 5s canceled by Shanghai I.J.P.O. CDS on Nov. 5, 1898.

On the back arrival Tokyo CDS of Nov. 10, 1898.

大清郵政史(1897-1911)之混合封--- 日本客郵局(二) - 延陵牧星 - 牧星谭邮--肖宏的博客

 

大清郵政史(1897-1911)之混合封--- 日本客郵局(二) - 延陵牧星 - 牧星谭邮--肖宏的博客

 Similar cover from Mr. Tu's collection

The cover on this page "C1" and the one on Mr. Tu's page "C2" were similar, sent to the same destination (to the same addressee) at about the same time except C1 dispatched from Shanghai while C2 originated from Tientsin. C2 was bearing 10c Chinese and 10s Japanese stamps according to the international rate at that time.

Why was this cover franked with only 5c Chinese and 5s Japanese stamps?

What is the postage rate shown on this cover?

Since the very beginning of Imperial Post, postal rate to Japan had been under the UPU tariff category. Letter rate was 10c per ? oz. This rate did not change until 1903 when a special rate to Japan was established. Effective from July 18, 1903, letter rate to Japan had been reduced to 3c per ? oz. Since the cover in question was sent in Oct. 1898, according to the rate of that time, 10c should be the correct Chinese postage. I could not find an explanation on the 5c franking and why it was not treated as a postage due item after checked several books on Chinese postal rate. 

Mr. Marc Symens suggested that I should looked into the Japanese (IJPO) rate for an explanation. I suddenly saw the light. I checked Meiso Mizuhara's The Magnificent Collection of Chinese Stamp - Second Series, Vol. III, "Imperial Japanese Post Office in Chinese Mainland" and confirmed that the IJPO rate for letters from China to Japan was indeed 5 sen until the end of 1898. 

At that time, the rate for Chinese silver dollar and Japanese Yen was about the same value as far as the post offices were concerned, 10 cents Chinese dollar was equivalent to 10 sen Japanese Yen. In case of international mail, if senders put 10 cents Chinese stamp(s), the IPO would add 10 sen Japanese stamp(s) before handing the letter to the IJPO in Shanghai. The IJPO letter rate was 10 sen except for mail to Japan that was only 5 sen. Some sender knew of the lower IJPO rate to Japan and the equivalent amount in Chinese dollar. They took advantage of the difference between the two rates and therefore saved half the postage. Although I have not found confirmation of this in writing yet, there should be documentation that exist referring to this. For the time being, we are assuming that since the sender already paid 5 cents in Chinese stamp (equivalent to 5 sen), the IPO would not lose money on the item, it was therefore an acceptable practice. By the way, any mail matter items to Japan originated from IPO was quite rare, and you can check Mr. Mizuhara's collection.

After July 18, 1903

大清郵政史(1897-1911)之混合封--- 日本客郵局(二) - 延陵牧星 - 牧星谭邮--肖宏的博客
 3c per ? oz. rate for letters.
大清郵政史(1897-1911)之混合封--- 日本客郵局(二) - 延陵牧星 - 牧星谭邮--肖宏的博客
 1.5c rate for postcards.

By Paul Lee---filatelist@hotmail.com
  评论这张
 
阅读(98)| 评论(0)
推荐

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017